Ooops…

Not much else to say about the evidently inadvertent release by an Iraqi guard of Abass Hussein Alwan al-Amry,
a suspected Iraqi bomb-maker
, indeed, among the first if not the first such “insurgent” bomb-maker linked to a roadside bomb by forensic evidence. Mistakes will be made… recall the accounts that 70-90% of those we held at Abu Ghraib were completely innocent of anything. Amidst this aggressive capture net, there follows a rapid-release effort… and, once in a while, if nothing more than a file-notation to the effect of “hold indefinitely-dangerous dude” is taken for the bad-ass prisoners… well, mistakes will happen. In that sense, this is nothing all that unusual: all human systems are not fool-proof, and dangerous prisoners are, on occasion, released unintentionally.
Still, in a world where the United States takes it upon itself to round up whomever it feels like with scant if any due process and then argue it can hold whomever it likes forever and do with whomever it likes whatever it likes… perhaps we should look at some examples of the omniscience of such a system, and whether it justifies the omnipotence the system claims for itself…
One might want to look at, say, the United States’ own decision to release Nabil al-Narabh (to Syria no less) a terror suspect who had risen to 27th on our FBI’s most wanted list.
Or, as I learned during my interview with Joshua Dratel, attorney for Guantaimo Bay detainee David Hicks, that one Mahmoud Habib, an Australian national suspected of being an Al Qaeda hand-to-hand combat instructor, and quite possibly an instructor for the 9-11 highjackers, was released to Australia, just ahead of his lawsuit challening his previous “rendition” to a friendly neighborhood cooperative nation for “interrogation” prior to his sojourn in Cuba.
One might, say, look at the big picture, and ask if, given all of these rather serious mistakes, if maybe we should, oh… ask some questions? Just asking…

Share